Lieberman Defects While Public Support for Medicare E Grows
Joe Lieberman is no Olympia Snowe (R-ME). Many progressives admired Olympia Snowe’s stance (even if they disagreed with her). By contrast Lieberman’s announcement that he may join the Republicans in a filibuster that aims to block letting the health care reform bill come to the Senate floor is merely vintage Lieberman. He’s an opportunist. I knew him many years ago, back in Connecticut, when a reform candidate was challenging the Democratic machine. Lieberman wavered on the sidelines, waiting to see who was going to win. He didn’t want to risk picking a losing team.
Today, as Lincoln Mitchell points out on Huffington Post: “By wavering between the two parties while never fully abandoning the Democratic Party, Lieberman has made himself far more important than he should be. If he were to formally switch parties, he would suddenly be of little interest to the Republicans as he would be just another member of the minority who would probably be suspect because his right wing credentials would not be strong enough for the Limbaugh-Palin wing of the party.”
Nevertheless, the media will make much of this story. It’s a headline; headlines sell newspapers.
Ann--
Thanks for your comment.
You wrote: "Medicare E is about treating healthcare as a human service based on science and caring . . "
That's it in a nutshell.
Posted by: Maggie Mahar | November 04, 2009 at 07:34 PM
Gail, Rick, Dgenerative Arthritis,
Gail & Rick --
Thanks for your suppot regarding Lieberman.
I agree. I don't see him as a real threat.
Degenerative Arhtritis--
I've very glad you read the blog. And thank yuu for the kind words.
Posted by: Maggie Mahar | November 02, 2009 at 01:50 AM
Medicare E is about treating healthcare as a human service based on science and caring that prioritizes people's healthcare and financial security needs. It's not about "Chairman Mao" as one commentor here tried to make it--Pahleeeez!! There's no sound logic in trying to compare healthcare services to computers b/c there's no "free market" in healthcare. People die when they don't receive needed care.
HealthBeat readers might want to take a look at remarks on the ethics of health reform made by a primary care doc and advocate at a 10/27/09 roundtable (link below). They provide a useful perspective for which to view the actions of Joe Leiberman and every other sitting politician; every member of Congress has the responsibility to enact real health reform. Real reform will prevent illness, save lives, and it will save LOTS of money. Really. Just look around the world for examples; it's not rocket science.
Real reform requires that politicians put people before the corporate profiteering and personal fortune-making that dominate our current broken, wasteful, and harmful "healthcare system". Trust me, I've seen it all in my work as a nurse in hospitals, homecare, and community settings.
For the majority of Americans real reform means creating Medicare E Everybody In, Nobody Out to provide a better deal and better care for all of us.
Ethics of reform roundtable remarks are here http://pnhp.org/blog/2009/10/28/the-ethics-of-health-care-reform
Posted by: Ann Malone, RN | October 29, 2009 at 02:16 PM
I rarely post, but I wanted to say thanks for sharing this information.
Posted by: Degenerative Arthritis | October 29, 2009 at 12:20 PM
Just heard you on Bill Handels show. What nonsense. Profit motive makes healthcare more expensive? What about opening it up to competition. How much would PCs be if there was no MAC??? How much would a piece of crap GM car cost if there was no Honda?? Health care is expensive because it IS subsidized by the Government and the outrages lawsuits that drive insurance costs up for doctors and hospitals. BTW who do the trial lawyers support. Is chairman Mao your hero too?. I hear he pushed universal healthcare too.
Posted by: conspunk | October 29, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Tom --
Thanks much
Oh yes, I rmemeber, a quisling appeases the occupying forces. A turncoat.
As I recall this was the name of someone in Scandanvia who went over to the Nazis. (This was very unusual inhis country)
Posted by: Maggie Mahar | October 28, 2009 at 11:15 PM
Remember the name Quisling?
Posted by: Tom Moore | October 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM
Is Lieberman an 'opportunist' because you disagree with him? If he joined with Reid, would he then be considered a principled statesman? www.MDWhistleblower.blogspot.com
Posted by: Michael Kirsch, M.D. | October 28, 2009 at 09:44 PM
My take on Joe Lieberman at best an ATTENTION SEEKER - At worst a self destructive MARTYR
He is toast.
Dr.Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
Posted by: Dr. Rick Lippin | October 28, 2009 at 06:24 PM
I have little regard for him after seeing his last exploit.
Posted by: Gail Nowacky | October 28, 2009 at 03:50 PM