Last week the House voted—for the 37th time—to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Everyone knows that repeal will never pass the Senate. Some suggest that legislators might better spend their time (and our tax dollars) figuring out how to create jobs.
Even the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) couldn’t take this 37th vote seriously. When preparing for this latest showdown, Republican Paul Ryan requested an update to CBO’s July 2012 estimate that repealing the ACA would cost more than it would save, increasing the deficit by some $109 billion over the coming decade (2013-2022.)
CBO replied to his request: “Preparing a new estimate of the budgetary impact of repealing the Affordable Care Act would take considerable time – probably several weeks – for CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, because there are hundreds of provisions in the ACA and those provisions are already in various stages of implementation. . . We have just finished the time-consuming task of updating our baseline budget projections and need to finish our analysis of the President’s budgetary proposals.”
CBO added that when it does have time to do an update, it expects similar results. Repealing health care reform would add to the deficit.
Are Republicans Crazy . . . Or Cunning?
You might think that by continuing to obsess over a bill that will never succeed, Republicans are once again exhibiting their self-destructive tendencies. But I would argue that House Republican leaders are not crazy, at least not in a way that is easy to understand. They’re cunning.
Ask yourself this: How many people skimmed or half-heard the news stories telling them that the House had passed a bill to repeal Obamacare?
This helps to explain why 12 percent of all Americans believe that the ACA already has been scrubbed. Every time a commentator mentions “health care reform” and “repeal” in the same sentence, the words will sink into that morass of half-truths and fictions that we call “the conventional wisdom.”
Even if people realize that the ACA is now the law of the land, many take the repeated efforts to kill reform as a sign that there is something very wrong with the legislation.
After all, they think: “why would Republicans spend so much time trying to overturn a law if there wasn’t something terribly wrong with it?”
Of course House Republicans also voted against re-authorizing the Violence Against Women Act. (Until it became crystal clear that they were once again tossing the women’s vote under the bus.) Then there was the time when they voted unanimously to support an anti-abortion bill that redefines rape as “coercive” (as opposed to voluntary rape?) GOP solidarity is not necessarily a sign of clear thinking.